Student Experience Platforms (SXP) 2025–2035: Market Size, Growth, and Vendor Landscape in Higher Education

A data-driven report on how Student Experience Platforms are reshaping recruitment, retention, and digital campus strategy across global higher education.

Download Full Report | View Key Findings

Why this report now

Student expectations have shifted to always-on, mobile-first, and hyper-personalized experiences that mirror consumer apps, forcing universities and colleges to rethink how they orchestrate every interaction across the student lifecycle. Student Experience Platforms (SXP) have emerged as the strategic layer that unifies portals, engagement tools, analytics, and SIS/LMS data into a single, coherent digital experience.

This report helps institutional leaders, CIOs, CMOs, and product teams understand where the SXP market is today, how fast it is growing, and what differentiates leading vendors and architectures.

What this report covers

• Market definition and scope
  Clear definition of Student Experience Platforms and how they differ from traditional SIS, LMS, CRM, and Digital Experience Platforms, with a practical reference architecture for higher education.
• Market size, growth, and regional outlook
  Current global market size estimates for adjacent segments such as learning experience platforms and digital experience platforms, along with indicative growth rates and regional trends applied to SXP adoption in higher education.
• Use cases across the student lifecycle
  How SXPs support recruitment, onboarding, advising, student success, retention, alumni engagement, and continuous learning, including examples of institutions unifying experiences through campus portals and digital hubs.
• Technology and architecture
  Core capabilities including integration with SIS/LMS, mobile apps, personalized communication, analytics, and AI-driven nudges, plus discussion of cloud-native, API-first, and low-code options.
• Competitive landscape and vendor types
  Overview of platform categories and representative vendors across campus portals, student engagement platforms, and broader digital experience platforms, highlighting positioning, strengths, and gaps.
• Implementation challenges and risks
  Common barriers such as siloed data, legacy systems, change management, and digital skills gaps, plus lessons from broader EdTech and higher education digital transformation efforts.
• Regulation, data privacy, and trust
  How student data privacy, consent, accessibility expectations, and regional regulations are shaping SXP design and procurement criteria.
• Strategic recommendations
  Actionable guidance for leaders on building a student-centric roadmap, selecting the right platform model, sequencing implementation waves, and measuring impact on enrollment, retention, and student satisfaction.

Who should read this report

• University and college presidents, provosts, and boards shaping long-term digital strategy and student success priorities.​

• CIOs, CTOs, and heads of digital tasked with consolidating fragmented portals, apps, and systems into a coherent student experience layer.​

• CMOs, enrollment, and student affairs leaders aiming to improve engagement, yield, retention, and sense of belonging through digital channels.​

• EdTech vendors, product leaders, and investors looking for insight into how SXP demand intersects with SIS, LMS, CRM, and DXP markets.​

Key questions answered

• What exactly is a Student Experience Platform, and how is it different from an LMS, SIS, CRM, or “campus portal”?​

• What market signals from adjacent segments (LXP, DXP, student engagement platforms) indicate the growth trajectory for SXPs in higher education?​

• Which capabilities matter most to students and institutions, and which are emerging as differentiators (e.g., AI personalization, nudging, mobile experience, analytics)?​

• What are the main adoption barriers and failure modes, and how are leading institutions overcoming them?​

• How should higher education leaders prioritize investments and choose between building on an existing stack vs. adopting a dedicated SXP?​